Objectivism and Parenthood: The Choice That Must Be Yours

Most discussions about parenthood focus on how to raise children. Objectivism begins earlier — with the question almost no one dares to ask:

Should you have children at all?

Not as a duty.
Not as a cultural expectation.
Not as a sacrifice.
But as a personal, rational, deeply individual choice.

Parenthood is not a moral obligation.
It is not “the purpose of life.”
It is not something you owe to society, your family, your culture, or your bloodline.

For an Objectivist, there is only one standard:

Will having a child make your life better, richer, happier — on your terms?

🧑‍🍼

No Duty to Reproduce

Objectivism rejects every collectivist idea that claims individuals exist to “continue the species,” “serve the nation,” or “honor tradition.”

You do not owe humanity new citizens.

You do not owe your culture new members.

You do not owe your parents grandchildren.

Your life is yours alone.

🤱

Parenthood as a value — not a sacrifice

If you choose to have a child, it should be because:

You truly want the experience.

You see raising a new human mind as a profound personal value.

You want the joy, not the “duty,” of parenthood.

You see a child not as a burden, but as a chosen addition to your life.

Parenthood is only moral when it is selfish — in the rational, Objectivist sense. A child must be a value you actively desire, not a sacrifice you passively endure.

🧑‍🍼

Objectivism vs Modern Anti-Natalism

Two completely different worlds

In today’s Western culture, there is a growing movement that encourages people not to have children — but for reasons that are the exact opposite of Objectivism.

They claim:

“Having children destroys the environment.”

“Humanity is the real parasite.”

“Motherhood is oppression.”

“Bringing life into the world is immoral.”

Let’s be clear:

Objectivism rejects this entire worldview.

These movements do not defend individual choice.
They do not defend happiness.
They do not defend rational evaluation of values.

They are rooted in a hatred of human life, a belief that mankind is destructive, toxic, or burdensome.
Where Objectivism celebrates man as a heroic being, they portray him as a disease.

Where Objectivism sees motherhood (when chosen freely) as a positive, life-enhancing value, they see it as servitude.

Where Objectivism affirms the morality of pursuing joy, they preach guilt, fear, and self-erasure.

The Objectivist position is the opposite:
Human life is good.
Human creativity is good.
Human flourishing is good.

If you don’t want children, that is a perfectly moral choice — as long as it comes from your personal values, not from a philosophy that despises mankind.

🤱

Rejecting Guilt, Pressure, and Expectations.

Society pressures adults with myths like:

“Real adults have kids.”

“You owe it to your family.”

“It’s selfish to stay childless.”

Objectivism rejects these myths.

But it also rejects the opposite pressure from anti-human ideologies:

“It’s selfish to create life.”

“You harm the planet by having children.”

“Motherhood is submission.”

BOTH forms of pressure are immoral. Your life is not a tool for tradition — and not a tool for environmental guilt or political ideology either.

Your choice must be yours.

🧑‍🍼

The Responsibility Standard

Objectivism holds one absolute:

If you choose to create a life, you are responsible for that life — until it becomes a rational, self-sustaining individual.

A child is not a full moral agent. He cannot live independently, feed himself, or make long-range decisions.
During this stage of dependence, parents have a self-chosen obligation to provide the essentials that allow him to grow into an autonomous human being.

But this responsibility has a clear, objective endpoint:

When the child becomes an adult capable of independent judgment and self-support, parental responsibility ends — completely.

Adulthood means ownership of one’s mind and one’s choices.
A parent’s role is to bring a future adult to the threshold of independence — not to hold him in permanent guardianship.

And what if the child grows into an irrational adult?

Then the principle remains the same:
an adult is fully responsible for his life, whether he uses it wisely or foolishly.

If he becomes lazy, parasitic, evasive, or destructive, that is his moral failure — not his parents’.
Parents have no obligation to support an adult who rejects reason.
They may keep goodwill or affection, but they must never sacrifice themselves to enable irrationality.

Rational parenthood ends in independence. What an adult does with that independence is his responsibility alone.

🤱

The Objectivist view in one sentence

Have children only if they are a joy you deeply want — never because the world expects it, and never because the world hates itself.

Your life is your highest value.
Parenthood is optional.
Chosen happiness is the only moral standard.

HOME